11.06.2012

Books? That's My Thing!: Fairy Tales

    Yes, this week we are gonna talk about fairy tales! No, that's not because it was the first thing that flashed before my head when I finally sat down and wrote the post. Actually, I was just as clueless as you might be about fairytales. You must have read or at least heard of some of fairy tales when you were a kid, but ever wandered what actually deemed them as fairy tales?

     I did a little research (more like typing fairy tales in Wiki and copy the the first definition of it :P) A fairy tale is supposed to be a short story that features all kinds of mystical creatures. Fairies, goblins, elves, trolls, whatever, and it usually was sprang from a legend or has a hidden meaning behind it (I'd like to say that should count as a fable, but that's what the Wiki said :P). A fairy tale doesn't always concerns a fairy, so why was it called a fairy tale? Well, it was all pretty much out on the Internet but I will tell you. Fairy tales were first discovered and loved in France, in France, they call these stories "conte de fee", and it translate to "fairy tale"! (Yup, pretty straight forward story. Although I still wanted to know why the French would name it that way in the first place...)

    Anyway, despite the definition, I must say the meaning of a fairy tale is still pretty general and vague. For example, all the paranormal novels we now read always have some sort of mythical creature or magic in it, so does this means paranormal novels are also fairy tales? Personally, I have some theories on how to identify a fairy tale. But as usual, they are flawed. Plus the subject was kind of debated by literary figures over the years, so they definitely are very rough ideas... Well, here we go.

    The first thing that I thought is that it had to be set in an imagined land/place, not a real place. I felt that a lot when I was reading fairy tales (when I was a kid, of course), the feeling that you are reading a story that happened in a secret region, a region where magic was possible, it just made the whole thing all the more fantastical. Though there were actually YA books out there that happened in imagined and totally different universes, like:

                     

Basically all high fantasy novels fit this description :P

    The second thing was that it happens in the past, an older time period, not in the modern days. Or if the story prefers, their own period of time as well. Seriously, usually fairy tales happened during times when everywhere were still using monarchy, so I would consider a fairy tale as something that happened in the old times, or on their own level of time (that takes some world-building). Of course there are also a wide variety of YA books out there that had this particular element. Dystopian novels are already very good examples. And since I am too lazy to paste covers again, you would just have to find dystopain novels yourself... ;P

     The third thing is that there are no sub-plots. Have you ever read a version of Red Riding Hood that captured two parts of lives in the story, like one for Liitle Red Riding Hood and the other one for her friends and relatives or  whatsoever. That never happens even though there were tons of endings to the book that some even included cannibalism. A little gross...:( This one would be hard to find in any novels at all, because I am pretty sure a novel must include at least one or two sub-plots.

    And that's pretty much it, if a story consisted of these 3 elements I would consider it a fairy tale. 

    So, I've made myself clear as to what I think count as fairy tales, how about you? What do you think fairy tales are? How would you consider a book is a fairy tale? What's you favorite fairy tale? Comment below! :)

11.05.2012

Review: The Secret Sisterhood of Heartbreakers by Lynn Weingarten

Title: The Secret Sisterhood of Heartbreakers
Author: Lynn Weingarten
Genre: Young Adult, Paranormal Romance, Contemporary
Publisher: Harper Teen
Synopsis/Summary: If there’s an upside to having your heart broken, it’s this: A broken heart makes you brave.
The first day of sophomore year doesn’t go the way Lucy planned. After a summer apart from her boyfriend, she’s ready to greet him with a special surprise and instead gets a shocking one in return: He’s breaking up with her. Beyond devastated, Lucy has no idea how she’s going to make it through homeroom, let alone the rest of her life.
Enter three stunning girls with the unnatural ability to attract boys and an offer Lucy can’t refuse: They can heal her heart in an instant. And then she’ll be one of them—a member of a sisterhood that is impervious to heartbreak and has access to magic distilled from the tears of brokenhearted boys. But to gain their power, Lucy must get a guy to fall in love with her the old-fashioned way, and then break his heart in the next seven days.
While the sisterhood may need another Heartbreaker, Lucy’s only desire is to get her ex back. But how far is she willing to go, and who is she willing to cross to get what she wants? -Taken from Goodreads


     The plot of The Secret Sisterhood of Heartbreakers are pretty simple, and rang true to the title. Lucy, our main character (this book was written in 3rd person POV), just got dumped by her boyfriend Alex, needless to say she was heartbroken, then something magical happened. A senior names Olivia offered her a chance to join The Secret Sisterhood of Heartbreakers, and from then on we got to see Lucy's journey morphing into a better, less pathetic version of herself.

    The plot was pretty cute. There weren't really complex storylines, nor were there unfathomable mysteries, but this still sucked me in. Mostly I thought it was the idea behind the book that lured me. Heartbreakers, which in truth were a little like witches, as you could see from the blurb on the back of the book, were a really refreshing idea, and a fun new way to write a coming-of-age story about dealing with heartbreaks. And of course, we had our favorite ingredient, magic.

    Though the book concerned magic, I would still call it a contemporary read. It was sort of a story of how Lucy got over her heartbreak, and the process wasn't all that magical at all. Plus it brought us to some important philosophies such as how we viewed ourselves were actually reflected on how other people viewed us, nobody was absolutely perfect, but the idea was to believe we were good, not perfect, just good, and don't look down on yourself. That itself was a very important advice and the book delivered it without burdening the story at all. That made the book a very meaningful read.

    The book actually just span for seven days (eight days if you count the last few ending chapters), but out main character had changed a lot during these seven days. It was actually quite unrealistic, I mean, you couldn't change a person in seven days, at least not in the way Lucy did. She practically grew out of her old shell, not that it was bad, just that it happened within seven days was kind of unbelievable. Oh well, that was a small complaint compared to the whole goodiness of the book :P

    I also wanted to note the writing. It was really good. The book was told in 3rd person and if you had looked at some old posts you would know I usually hated them, but I liked the 3rd person narrative of this book! It flew seamlessly and there were no awkward moments at all, plus I was so into the book that I actually didn't realize it was in 3rd person until I took a break. I felt like I was looking at the whole story through Lucy's eyes, even though it was not in 1st narrative. It was definitely good and was a good example to 3rd person narrative books. I have read ones that was written awkwardly that I was very aware when the narrative moved from the mind of one character to another, it was quite annoying actually, but The Secret Sisterhood of Heartbreakers didn't have this problem at all!


    The magic in this book was really unique. Unique as in it wasn't dark at all. Often I've seen books with magic element in it that portrayed it as dark, and sometimes, evil. For example the latest book that I've read, Beautiful Creatures actually featured magic as kind of dark too. Even Harry Potter portrayed magic at as a dark tool, at least in the later books. So there was no mistaking that many magic books that contained magic was also kind heavy, or dark. But not this one. The idea behind the magic was still pretty general stuff, although the broken-heart-tear thing was new and very fitting, it wouldn't stand out from all the magic books out there if the story was more dark. But since the book portrayed it as a more "light" thing, it made the book stood out. That was really good :)


     I had a pretty neutral feeling towards all of the characters. I didn't particularly like one character more than the other, or hate anyone (well except Alex, from the moment she broke up with Lucy, I knew he was not a good guy for her. Still Lucy had to stumble back to him, it was actually pathetic :P) in particular.

    To be honest, I actually hated Lucy during the first half of the book. She was so pathetic, clinging to someone who broke up with her and clearly didn't like her, hanging around like a puppy. Plus she totally lacked social skills, she would constantly went mute at times, because she was too afraid to say anything, which annoyed me a lot. Luckily as the story progress she became more brave(?), well, at least she had better social skills, and she was confident too.

    I never really liked Alex, not one bit. Even from memories of when he and Lucy were together, I knew he wasn't a good boyfriend, at least not to Lucy. He would always ignore her, and except for several moments, I actually couldn't see him show any affection towards Lucy at all. He clearly wasn't as into the relationship as Lucy, and that was well proven at the later part of the story.


  I would give this book 3.5 stars. It was a fun and light read, but I liked my books with a little bit more mystery. The book didn't offer much in terms of plot twists and turns, but it sure flew really well, with big incidents here and there too. They were plot holes, or at least loose ends if the book was to turn into a series, which I would happily buy and read, in the book, but it didn't really killed the enjoyment.  I would have given it more stars if the characters were slightly more unique though. One last thing to mention, the cover! It was gorgeous, and I didn't know why, but the cover reminded me of Christmas! Probably was the whole silver and red thing, or maybe it was that the book was released around Christmas :P I would recommend this to young readers of YA, this book was light and the story wasn't too dark, also this would appeal well to readers of contemp books, and paranormal readers could give it a go too, though this book was a little different than usual paranormal reads, this was more "light" ;)

Rating: 3.5 stars (I didn't have 3.5 stars image, so this one will have to do :P



Phew, we are finally back on schedule! This book was great, I read it in like 5 hours or so. So, some questions for you guys, what kind of sisterhood would you like to join? Would you want to be a heartbreaker? It isn't as bad as it sounds ;) Did you enjoy the book? Cool cover, right? There were quite a few loose ends, would you like a sequel and what would you want it to be about? Comment below, I am waiting :)

11.04.2012

Weekly Wrap-Up (3)

The week's over! And I had a lot of reading and writing waiting ahead of me for missing so many reviews this week, and NaNoWriMo was going well, considering, thanks for all of your support and luck ;) So, this week I basically only posted two memes and one review, but I will do a recap anyway. I bought tons of books this week though, and I couldn't wait to share it with you guys!

Monday: I was supposed to post a review, but I couldn't finish Beautiful Creatures on time :(

Tuesday: Books? That's My Thing: My Life on the Day of Halloween (I probably had the most boring life ever, so don't hold high hopes for this one, there were no ghostly encounters, costumes or even candies in the post... :P)

Wednesday: Review: Beautiful Creatures by Kami Garcia and Margaret Stohl (I posted this one in a hurry and didn't review, needless to say I found tons of typos and problem sentences later, but I still didn't edit it. I used "though" three times in three corresponding sentences, what is happening to me?)

Thursday: Where I took a gratuitous break, I should be ashamed...

 Friday: I posted a random rambling about joining NaNoWriMo this year, thanks for all of your support, let's work to the goal together! (I am currently on 5867 words by the way)

Saturday: Again, nothing... *sigh* 


Books I bought this week!

  


~From the bookstore (I spent hours finding these books!)~








~From Giveaway~



Thanks Ex Libris for banned books week giveaway! I am excited to have won! ;)




~From online bookstore (will be in in two weeks! Link to GRs in the photos!)~





How was your week? It had been a bookful week for me! Also a testing week too *pun intended* ;P Comment below! Tell me what new books you've got this week, how was your NaNoWriMo status? :)

11.02.2012

NaNoWriMo!

    Okay, I know this is a little late for a NaNoWriMo post, but I joined it for the first time this year! My goal would be to write 50000 words, so far I've got 3534 words down, I am actually on schedule :) But that's a different thing than writing a good story. I feel like my story is too childish, the plot too stupid, whatever self-doubt you feel when you are writing a novel. The plot actually sounded really good in my head and on my notes, but when I started writing it, the magic's gone :( Of course I tried to hang on to it, maybe things will pick up soon... I hope.

   Anyway, I will be doing a lot of writing this month! Between the blog and NaNoWriMo and school, I don't know how fast I'll read, but I'll try to stick to the posting schedule, three reviews a week, I can do it! Also, my NaNo account name is Usada (linked to my pofile) (it's an old name that I used when I was a kid, I loved Anime back then...) If you guys want to, please add me as your writing buddy, I could use some support, thanks ;)





Have you guys ever joined NaNoWriMo? How does it feels like when you finished a novel? Do you have the same concerns I have when writing a novel? Like you're not sure if the voice of the narrator is too young, too old or the plot was too stupid? Comment below! I am off to write my daily dose of novel :P


Feature & Follow (7)

Exams are over! Yes! And I think I aced most of the subjects <3 Sorry for the lack of posts this week, I was studying and I couldn't finish the books on time (The Caster Chronicles books are all huge blocks, I am surprised I can finish one in 3 days :P), so I didn't have reviews to post. Yes, I should stack up some reviews so I wouldn't have to work in a haste, but I couldn't read extra fast so 3 books a week is kind of my limit... I actually have a schedule, not that I missed a couple reviews, it was all messed up too... *sigh* It was always like that after the exams, even my desk looks like a battlefield. Well I guess you guys don't want to see me continue my rant so I'll move on to this week's question:
Q: What is a deal breaker for you in a book? For example, do you abhor love triangles? Or can’t deal with bad editing?
You know, this week's question is kind of similar to last week's question. I actually have almost the same answers. So, I will begin with the example of a DNF book: Envy by Gregg Olsen. (I actually have the review right here!) See, the deal breaker for me in a book is when it has more than 4 POVs.
I know I said I couldn't take more than 2 before, but that was just irritating, but when there is more than 4... It's horror! Things are happening all over the place, the characters are all flat, because there wasn't enough time for readers to get accustomed to one single character. Plus, like I said, I hate switching POVs! So, um, The Diviners by Libba Bray is definitely not for me. 'Nff said.



What about you guys? What can't you take in a book than will make you drop it like hot coal? I must apologize again for the lack of posts this week! Sorry guys, <3 you! ;)